Home | Products | Directory | e-Updates | Digital Editions | Calendar | Advisory Board | Videos | Corporate Videos | Media Kit
Access Control Access ControlIT Security IT SecurityCCTV CCTVLegislation LegislationAssociations AssociationsRisk Management Risk ManagementEducation EducationIntegration Integration

Protecting patient data PDF Print E-mail
How secure are your IT systems?
 
Written by Neil Sutton, on Mon-March-2008

An American information security firm is reporting a dramatic rise in attacks on electronic patient records and Canadian health-care security experts believe the threat is just as real north of the border.

SecureWorks, based in Atlanta, GA, says it has seen an 85 per cent increase in the number of attempted attacks directed toward its health-care clients by Internet hackers in the last year. Other sectors saw only a modest rise of around 15 per cent.

There are a number of reasons why health-care institutions are being singled out by hackers, says Hunter King, a researcher at SecureWorks’ counter threat unit, the main one being that hospitals just aren’t as prepared for cyber attack as other industries, such as banking.

Financial institutions and credit card companies were typically the main targets, says King, but they’ve responded by tightening up their security and educating their clients about safe banking procedures. Hospitals are sometimes more lax about security maintenance and IT policies for staff.

“A large portion of it is that their IT staff isn’t really familiar with what attacks are going on or even if they are being attacked in the first place,” he says. “A lot of them don’t have policies about what staff are allowed to view on the web. Banks may have already looked at social networking sites or sites that exist just for entertainment purposes and have those blocked. But health care really doesn’t have that.”

Hackers are exploiting this fact and attacking client PCs rather than the more difficult to reach targets, such as servers.

 Michael Power, vice-president of privacy and security for the Smart Systems for Health Agency, an Ontario government-funded institution that has created a technology infrastructure for hosting e-health records, says that there “may be an unevenness in the practice by health care professionals, because in a lot of instances their priority is not the security of the information but providing the best health outcomes for patients.”

The reason American health records make a tantalizing target for hackers is the potential for insurance fraud — a potentially lucrative source of criminal income. Canada’s socialized medical system may help make it less of a target, says King.

Power says that Canadian health records are less damaging in terms of their potential for identity theft, but the threat is still very real.

“There are some people who believe — and I’m not adverse to the assumption — that the biggest kind of identity theft in this country will probably come through the health-care system.”

There have been several recent cases of Canadian health records going missing. So far, the high profile cases have been the result of someone misplacing a laptop or computer.

Last November, a consultant working for the Provincial Public Health Laboratory in Newfoundland and Labrador unplugged a computer and took it home with him. An anonymous tipster claiming to be a security consultant called after the computer was removed and said they were able to access patient health data over the Internet.
In January 2007, a laptop containing 2,900 patient records from the Hospital for Sick Children in Toronto was stolen from the van of a physician who was doing data analysis. The incident resulted in an investigation from the Ontario Privacy Commissioner Anne Cavoukian.

Jim Forbes, the CTO at SIMS, the shared information management services provider for Toronto-based University Health Network (UHN) and seven other institutions, says he hasn’t seen any increase in the number of hacker attacks on patient records “but I don’t see any reason why it would differ (from the U.S.) We certainly use the same technology from the same providers. I don’t think we would be any better off.”

Following the Sick Kids incident, Cavoukian ordered the hospital to encrypt its data to protect the safety of patients. SIMS, which doesn’t serve Sick Kids, has also opted to evaluate its security practices, and issued an RFP for technology to safeguard records by doing encryption at the desktop level. Encrypting individual hard drives would be one way of protecting patient information even if it happens to fall into the hands of a criminal.

“I don’t think we’re any less vulnerable than MasterCard or Visa or any of those companies anymore,” Forbes says.

“I’m not totally surprised to hear that hackers may be looking at new domains, new opportunities. But the health-care system is doing all that it can to protect (people), just as private sector industry does.”

Cost is an issue when it comes to upgrading security. Larger hospitals should be able to stay ahead of the game, he says, but smaller facilities may have a harder time keeping up. “I think at smaller organizations . . . you may find varying degrees of risk. Larger organizations, I think, have the resources, people and dollars typically to deal with those things.”




Published in : IT Security, News

Users' Comments (0)

No comment posted

Add your comment



mXcomment 1.0.9 © 2007-2010 - visualclinic.fr
License Creative Commons - Some rights reserved
< Prev   Next >

Latest Articles

About Us | Media Kit | Subscribe | Contacts | Site Map
© All materials on this web site are copyright protected and the property of CLB Media Inc.
For permission reprinting or reproducing any materials please email your requests.
© CLB MEDIA INC., 2010 Canadian Security Magazine
Privacy PolicyTerms & Conditions
[ Top ]